skip to main |
skip to sidebar
My very personal views on different issues. I try my best to be as accurate as possible, but please -all the time- have this in your mind that what I say could be all wrong!
Blog Archive
-
▼
2004
(106)
-
▼
October
(10)
- Bush v. Life
- Al Gore's Speech
- Noam Chomsky, in an open letter, asks voters in sw...
- Did you know that the value of one vote in Wyoming...
- I don't know how reliable this statistics is but i...
- New Round of Attacks on Kerry's Comments
- Bush Forgets He Owns a Tree-Growing Company
- FactCheck.Org
- Democratic "Rising Star" and Keynote Speaker Would...
- Lets Check the Facts from where Cheney Suggested!
-
▼
October
(10)
5 comments:
Yes I think it is! Which one do you think have not commited?!!
Im really happy to hear that you have studied at least most of his books(if not all), since you claim that everything he says (including linguistics) is wrong. We despretly need people like you who read the books written by the people that disagree with them.
Now that we agree on this point tell me frankly how many of Chomsky's books have you read?
In their opinion Kerry is "the least-worse" and Bush is so terrible that they dont want him to be re-elected. I dont see anything wrong with that. Of course they want Nader to be elected but since this is impossible they call for electing Kerry who is better than Bush. What is wrong with that?
With your argument Dean should nominate himself and McCain should have nominated himself for the president of the US. The progressive movement sees Bush so much terrible that asks voters to vote for a better choice. This doesnt mean that they support Kerry. This just means that people of the US can not afford Bush presidency any more(in the view of the progressives) and Kerry is a better choice. The issue is if you see Bush as a terrible president or you see him just as a bad president which does not have any differences with Kerry. When it comes to politics you dont always choose what is the best in dreams you choose what is the best in reality! Of course Chomsky and others understand your argument and Nader's, thats why they supported Nader in 2000.
Post a Comment